IHC adjourns bail plea listening to of Zahir Jaffer’s dad and mom until tomorrow

Zahir Jaffer, the important thing suspect within the Noor Mukadam homicide case. Photograph: NEWSONHY.television/ file
  • Listening to on bail plea of ​​dad and mom of fundamental suspect Zahir Jaffer in Noor Muqadam homicide case adjourned until tomorrow (Wednesday).
  • Justice Aamer Farooq of Islamabad Excessive Courtroom listening to bail functions.
  • On Friday, confessional assertion of Zahir Jaffer was learn out in courtroom.

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad Excessive Courtroom adjourned on Tuesday the listening to on the bail functions of the dad and mom of Zahir Jaffer, the prime suspect within the Noor Mukadam homicide case.

Justice Aamer Farooq of the IHC is listening to the bail pleas of ​​Zakir Jaffer and Ismat Adamjee.

The sufferer’s father and plaintiff Shaukat Mukadam’s lawyer Advocate Shah Khawar didn’t seem in courtroom as he was engaged in work on the Supreme Courtroom. 

The lawyer requested an hour’s break within the listening to of the case to offer his arguments. Nevertheless, Justice Farooq adjourned the listening to until tomorrow.

Earlier, Khawaja Harris, the counsel of Zahir’s dad and mom, had accomplished his arguments.

Zahir Jaffer’s confessional assertion has no authorized standing, lawyer tells IHC

On Friday, the confessional assertion of Zahir Jaffer – the prime suspect within the Noor Mukadam homicide case – was learn out in courtroom.

The assertion was learn out by lawyer Khawaja Harris, who’s representing Zahir’s dad and mom, Zakir Jaffer and Ismat Adamjee, throughout a listening to on their bail software which had resumed for the third consecutive day by the IHC.

To this, Justice Aamer Farooq had mentioned that our police have no idea make hyperlinks throughout an interrogation.

Harris had mentioned that he wished to inform the courtroom concerning the confessional assertion and name knowledge document. After this, he learn out the confessional assertion of Zahir Jaffer earlier than the police.

In his arguments, Harris had mentioned that one sentence modifications the form of the entire case. “What was the function of the daddy? Solely the restoration is talked about within the memo of restoration, so how did his assertion get included,” the lawyer had requested.

Justice Farooq had mentioned {that a} memo of restoration states the place the principle suspect takes an investigating officer and what’s recovered.

Harris had argued that the assertion recorded by the suspect in police custody has no authorized standing. He had mentioned the assertion of the suspect have to be recorded earlier than a Justice of the Peace.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button